Publication
6 July 202315:47

ESG Economist - Emission scenarios for road mobility

SustainabilityClimate policyEnergy transition

In this ESG Economist publication, we start with an overview of the greenhouse gas emissions for the mobility sector in the Netherlands. Here we find that the mobility sector is lagging behind in reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to the trends in emissions in the Dutch economy as a whole. Then we define three emission scenarios for the subcategories of road mobility: cars, buses, vans and trucks. With these scenarios we can clearly see what the possible trajectories are for these subsectors and crucially what the key assumptions are behind the different trajectories. Going forward, by monitoring developments in these assumptions, we can assess what trajectory looks most likely. We set out the following scenarios: policy/positive, base and negative. The policy scenario is also the positive scenario assuming that the government policy is executed according to plan and the bottlenecks are sufficiently addressed. In the other scenarios we take into account bottlenecks such as affordability, technology, costs, shortage of metals, challenges to adjust the grid that result in a deviation from the policy scenario.

Whereas GHG emissions for the Netherlands declined by 29% between 1990 and 2022, GHG emissions from mobility declined by only 8%

We have defined three possible future emission scenarios for cars, buses, vans and trucks namely policy/positive scenario, a base scenario and a negative scenario

For the policy scenario, which is also the positive scenario, we assume that the targets that the government has set will be reached and the charging and fuelling infrastructure will be ready on time. In this scenario, we also assume that the technologies develop in such a way that shortages of metals and/or batteries will be avoided and that marginal abatement costs of crucial technologies will decline and stimulate the adoption of zero-emission vehicles.

In our base scenario, we take government policy as a starting point but also incorporate some of the bottlenecks such as affordability, shortages of metals and batteries, delay of infrastructure readiness. The marginal abatement costs of the crucial technologies will decline but not enough to considerably stimulate the adoption of zero emission vehicles beyond the early movers.

In the negative scenario, we assume that there are substantial bottlenecks. The affordability remains an issue in cars as prices will rise due to substantial shortages in metals and/or batteries. The technologies will remain expensive resulting in a substantial longer use of old vehicles with internal combustion engines. Moreover the infrastructure will be far from ready for both battery electric vehicles and for fuel cells. There remains limited availability of green hydrogen and synthetic fuels for road transport and they remain expensive.

Share this research
  • Share via LinkedIn
  • Share via Facebook
  • Share via X
  • Share via Mail